PERTIMBANGAN HAKIM DALAM PENJATUHAN PIDANA DIBAWAH MINIMAL KHUSUS KASUS PELANGGARAN HAM YANG BERAT DI TIMOR -TIMUR. (STUDI KASUS PUTUSAN NOMOR.01/PID.HAM/AD.HOC/2002/PN.JKT. PST)

Manulang, Samuel Afrianto (2018) PERTIMBANGAN HAKIM DALAM PENJATUHAN PIDANA DIBAWAH MINIMAL KHUSUS KASUS PELANGGARAN HAM YANG BERAT DI TIMOR -TIMUR. (STUDI KASUS PUTUSAN NOMOR.01/PID.HAM/AD.HOC/2002/PN.JKT. PST). S1 thesis, UAJY.

	Text (Halaman Judul) HK116590.pdf Download (13MB)
	Text (BAB 1) HK116591.pdf Download (442kB)
	Text (BAB II) HK116592.pdf Download (521kB)
	Text (BAB III) HK116593.pdf Restricted to Registered users only Download (300kB)

Abstract

This thesis comes up with the title “Judges” Consideration on Distinctive Under Minimum Sentence the most serious crime in Timor-timur.” Great human rights violation is a conduct of massive crime resulting in a huge number of casualties as well as tremendous material loss. The major great human rights violation in Indonesia history took place during the Indonesia political transitition which culminated in a nationwide turmoil; one of them occurred in Timor-timor and caused an enourmous number of casualties. The crime was committed by both the military and the civilian. Former Timor-timor governor, one of the suspect of the great human rights violation in the region, was surprisingly sentenced to three years of incarceration. This sentence was far below prosecutor’s demand; a ten years and six months of incarceration. The sentence also violated the constitution which stipulated a ten years minimum of incarceration for such a crime. Writer’s research concludes that judges’ deviation towards constitution which was resulting in distinctive under minimum sentence is caused by flawed constitution on human rights judicature with multi- interpretation issue, illegal political consideration during the judgement, and pressure from the suspect’s backings as well as military group towards the judges.

Actions (login required)

View Item