DESIGNING PERFORMANCE APPRAISAL INSTRUMENT IN MISS BAKE

ARY, BAYU KENGKONGAN (2019) DESIGNING PERFORMANCE APPRAISAL INSTRUMENT IN MISS BAKE. S1 thesis, UAJY.

[img]
Preview
Text (HALAMAN AWAL)
TII079670.pdf

Download (487kB) | Preview
[img]
Preview
Text (BAB I)
TII079671.pdf

Download (80kB) | Preview
[img]
Preview
Text (BAB II)
TII079672.pdf

Download (582kB) | Preview
[img]
Preview
Text (BAB III)
TII079673.pdf

Download (201kB) | Preview
[img] Text (BAB IV)
TII079674.pdf
Restricted to Registered users only

Download (163kB)
[img] Text (BAB V)
TII079675.pdf
Restricted to Registered users only

Download (613kB)
[img] Text (BAB VI)
TII079676.pdf
Restricted to Registered users only

Download (707kB)
[img]
Preview
Text (BAB VII)
TII079677.pdf

Download (324kB) | Preview

Abstract

Competition on Small and Medium Enterprise in DIY especially in the culinary and beverage fields become more intense. It must be considerd by Miss Bake. The purpose of this case study are formulating performance appraisal instrument for the employee in Miss Bake and determining the importance level for every criteria related to the job in certain position in Miss Bake. Performance appraisal instrument in Miss Bake are Head of Production with 14 criteria and Leadership Ability (0.66) as the major criteria; Production Employee with 12 criteria and Attitude, Understand the culinary production process especially bread, pastry, cake, tart, etc (0.83) as the major criteria; Head of Warehouse with 12 criteria and Communication with all of the production employee (0.83) as the major criteria; Cashier with 17 criteria and Responsibility of making the customer comfortable in doing their activities in Miss Bake store (0.20) as the major criteria; Admin with 19 criteria and Making the financial statement (1.00) as the major criteria; Courier with 12 criteria and Communication with the customer (0.75) as the major criteria. In determining the major criteria for every position also considered the Task and Responsibilities, Expertise, and Characteristic weight for every position.

Item Type: Thesis (S1)
Uncontrolled Keywords: Performance Appraisal Instrument, Pairwise Comparison
Subjects: Industrial Engineering > Quality, Safety, Health and Environtment
Divisions: Fakultas Teknologi Industri > Teknik Industri Internasional
Depositing User: editor2 dua uajy
Date Deposited: 13 Mar 2019 06:48
Last Modified: 13 Mar 2019 06:48
URI: http://e-journal.uajy.ac.id/id/eprint/17529

Actions (login required)

View Item View Item