KAJIAN MENGENAI PENGGUNAAN ALAT BUKTI YANG SAMA DALAM PERSIDANGAN YANG BERBEDA UNTUK PERNYERTAAN TINDAK PIDANA

Making, Mariana Paramita Hurek (2019) KAJIAN MENGENAI PENGGUNAAN ALAT BUKTI YANG SAMA DALAM PERSIDANGAN YANG BERBEDA UNTUK PERNYERTAAN TINDAK PIDANA. S1 thesis, UAJY.

Preview	Text (HALAMAN AWAL) HK120540.pdf Download (2MB) | Preview
Preview	Text (BAB I) HK120541.pdf Download (263kB) | Preview
Preview	Text (BAB II) HK120542.pdf Download (389kB) | Preview
	Text (BAB III) HK120543.pdf Restricted to Registered users only Download (202kB)

Abstract

This legal research is about use the same evidence in the different trial for a complicity of actions. The problem in this legal research is whether the same evidence that had used in a trial can be used again in another trial for a complicity actions. The methodology of this legal research is normative law study. This legal research has a purpose to find out about use the same evidence in the different trial for a complicity actions. This legal research used primary data and secondary data. The primary data that used in this legal research is positive legal norms. In other hand, this legal research used secondary data which is literature, documents and legal facts from interviewees. To make a conclusion the author used deductive method. The conclusion of this legal research is that in the trial process, the evidence that had used in a trial can be used again in another trial as long as the evidence is qualify by Criminal Code Procedures Article 184 section (1) and used to prove a criminal act, especially the evidence has important role to prove a criminal act in the trial. The same evidence that allowed in other trial or for a complicity actions represents a value of justice for Indonesian society regarding of law enforcement. It represents value of justice for Indonesian society regarding of law enforcement because the perpetrator can not get away from Criminal Law if they are evident guilty.

Actions (login required)

View Item