TINJAUAN YURIDIS TERHADAP PUTUSAN KPPU DAN UPAYA HUKUM TERHADAP PIHAK YANG DIRUGIKAN KARENA ADANYA TYING AGREEMENT PADA PUTUSAN KPPU PERKARA NOMOR 10/KPPU-1/2016

Ginting, Samuel Permana (2021) TINJAUAN YURIDIS TERHADAP PUTUSAN KPPU DAN UPAYA HUKUM TERHADAP PIHAK YANG DIRUGIKAN KARENA ADANYA TYING AGREEMENT PADA PUTUSAN KPPU PERKARA NOMOR 10/KPPU-1/2016. S1 thesis, UNIVERSITAS ATMA JAYA YOGYAKARTA.

[img]
Preview
Text (Samuel Permana Ginting)
1605126251.pdf

Download (656kB) | Preview
[img] Text
1605126252.pdf
Restricted to Registered users only

Download (233kB)

Abstract

This research describes and examines several problems, first regarding how legal remedies for parties who are aggrieved by the existence of a binding agreement and whether the legal considerations decided by KPPU on case Number 10 / KPPU-1/2016 have provided a sense of justice to the parties. This research is a type of normative law, which is a scientific research system that determines the truth based on the scientific logic of law from the normative side. Scientific logic in normative legal research is built on the basis of scientific disciplines and methods of normative law, namely the science of law whose object is law itself. In this normative legal investigation, positive legal norms are examined in the form of statutory regulations, which are related to the title raised. This legal research focuses on library research, primary legal materials in the form of regulations and secondary legal materials in the form of books, journals, the internet. The results of the research show that legal remedies that can be achieved due to a binding agreement, the injured party can make a report as regulated in the Procedure for Submitting Reports / Complaints in accordance with the provisions of Law Number 5 of 1999 and the Regulation of the Business Competition Supervisory Commission Number. 1 of 2019 concerning Procedures for Handling Cases of Monopolistic Practices and Unfair Business Competition. And in the decision on case Number 10 / KPPU-1/2016, it is known that KPPU decided that PT. Telekomunikasi Indonesia does not provide justice for the parties because of the losses that must be borne by the reported party.

Item Type: Thesis (S1)
Uncontrolled Keywords: Tying agreement, court judgment, loss, legal effort
Subjects: Ilmu Hukum > Ekonomi Bisnis
Divisions: Fakultas Hukum > Program Studi Ilmu Hukum
Depositing User: editor2 dua uajy
Date Deposited: 15 Jul 2021 12:36
Last Modified: 15 Jul 2021 12:36
URI: http://e-journal.uajy.ac.id/id/eprint/24307

Actions (login required)

View Item View Item