KONTRADIKSI ANTARA KRIMIMALISASI GELANDANGAN YANG DIRUMUSKAN DALAM PASAL 431 RKUHP DENGAN SISTEM JAMINAN SOSIAL DI DAERAH ISTIMEWA YOGYAKARTA

HERLAMBANG, DHIOFANDA (2021) KONTRADIKSI ANTARA KRIMIMALISASI GELANDANGAN YANG DIRUMUSKAN DALAM PASAL 431 RKUHP DENGAN SISTEM JAMINAN SOSIAL DI DAERAH ISTIMEWA YOGYAKARTA. S1 thesis, UNIVERSITAS ATMA JAYA YOGYAKARTA.

Preview	Text (DHIOFANDA HERLAMBANG) 1605123581.pdf Download (357kB) | Preview
	Text 1605123582.pdf Restricted to Registered users only Download (342kB)
	Text 1605123583.pdf Restricted to Registered users only Download (391kB)
Preview	Text 1605123584.pdf Download (294kB) | Preview

Abstract

This writing is to find out the contradiction between the criminalization formulated in clause 431 of the RKUHP with the social security system and clause 431 of the RKUHP against the Vagabond are still relevant to improve social welfare. The method used by the author is the method of writing normative law. The results of the discussion of this thesis explain that there are two contradictions, that is: criminalization with the provision of disturbing public order which is also the responsibility of the state through the government to organize a social security program and punishment with a Category I fine of Rp. 1,000,000.00. contrary to the guarantee of proper basic needs for the Vagabound. That Vagabound in the Criminal Code is no longer relevant to be enforced in the future, because Vagabound is a social problem and clause 431 of the RKUHP does not pay attention to the main ideas in the concept of a welfare state in Indonesia. So that clause 431 of the RKUHP does not bring use value and positive effects in the lives of Vagabound people in the future.

Actions (login required)

View Item