TINJAUAN YURIDIS TERHADAP WEWENANG KOMISI YUDISIAL DALAM MENJAGA DAN MENEGAKKAN KEHORMATAN, KELUHURAN MARTABAT SERTA PERILAKU HAKIM

Tampubolon, Samuel Yose Geogartha (2021) TINJAUAN YURIDIS TERHADAP WEWENANG KOMISI YUDISIAL DALAM MENJAGA DAN MENEGAKKAN KEHORMATAN, KELUHURAN MARTABAT SERTA PERILAKU HAKIM. S1 thesis, UNIVERSITAS ATMA JAYA YOGYAKARTA.

Preview	Text (Samuel Yose Geogartha Tampubolon) 180513232_bab 0.pdf Download (605kB) | Preview
Preview	Text 180513232_bab 1.pdf Download (731kB) | Preview
	Text 180513232_bab 2.pdf Restricted to Registered users only Download (779kB)
Preview	Text 180513232_bab 3.pdf Download (447kB) | Preview

Abstract

The Juducial Commission is an institution formed in the reformed regime. The Judicial Commissionhas the authority to propose the appointment of Supreme Court justices and has other powers in the context of maintaining and upholding the honor, dignity, and behavior of judges as mandated by Article 24B paragraph (1)of the Constitution. This paper is entitled Juridical Review of the Authority of the Judicial Commission in Maintaining and Upholding the Honor, Noble Dignity, and Behavior of Judges. This paper analyzes, first, how the Judicial Commission has the authority to maintain the honor, dignity, and behavior of judges. Second, how the Judicial Commission authority to upholding the honor, dignity, and behavior of judges. This paper uses a normative legal research approach. The author concludes that first, the Judicial Commision’s authority in maintaining the honor, dignity, and behavior of judges has been strengthened after the amandement. However, after changes are made, the indicators or criteria for judge behavior that must be maintained are clear, namely based on the Code of Ethics and the Code of Conduct for Judges. Second, the authority of the Judicial Commission in upholding the honor, nobility and behavior of judges after the issuance of the Law No 18 of 2011 as an ammandement to Law No 22 of 2004 also appears to have been more comprehensive and further strengthens the authority of the Judicial Commissions in enforcing judges suspected of committing violations to the Code of Ethic and Code of Conduct for Judges. However, the decisions given by the Judicial Commission are not authoritative, meaning that the decisions given by the Judicial Commission are limite to providing recommendations or propising to the Supreme Court to impose sanctions on judges who have been proven to have violated the Code of Ethics and Code of Conduct for Judges.

Actions (login required)

View Item