PERLINDUNGAN HUKUM DALAM PELAKSANAAN PERJANJIAN WARALABA ANTARA PEMBERI DAN PENERIMA WARALABA (Studi Kasus Di Perusahaan PT. Mister Burger Pelita Harapan Indonesia yang Berkedudukan Di Wilayah Kabupaten Sleman)

Yanuarto, Romero Bima Mahardika (2023) PERLINDUNGAN HUKUM DALAM PELAKSANAAN PERJANJIAN WARALABA ANTARA PEMBERI DAN PENERIMA WARALABA (Studi Kasus Di Perusahaan PT. Mister Burger Pelita Harapan Indonesia yang Berkedudukan Di Wilayah Kabupaten Sleman). S1 thesis, Universitas Atma Jaya Yogyakarta.

Preview	Text (Romero Bima Mahardika Yanuarto) 190513387 0.pdf Download (1MB) | Preview
Preview	Text 190513387 1.pdf Download (928kB) | Preview
	Text 190513387 2.pdf Restricted to Registered users only Download (805kB)
Preview	Text 190513387 3.pdf Download (406kB) | Preview

Abstract

Franchise practices sometimes still experience problems even though an agreement has been reached between the franchisor and franchisee, including failure to fulfill the rights and obligations of the franchisor and franchisee. The purpose of writing this research is to find out how legal protection is in implementing a franchise agreement between the franchisor and the franchisee at the company PT Mister Burger Pelita Harapan Indonesia which is domiciled in the Sleman Regency area and whether the franchiser can terminate the agreement. unilaterally with the franchisee. Data collection was carried out using empirical research methods by conducting interviews with respondents. Based on the results of the research that has been carried out, the franchise agreement between the franchisor and the franchisee, the franchisor provides a guarantee to the franchisee, and the franchisor provides a guarantee to the franchisor. Based on Article 1338 paragraphs 1 and 2 of the Civil Code which reads as follows, it is stated that all agreements legally made by the parties are valid as law for those who make them. This means that everyone has the right to enter into any agreement, whether regulated by law or not, as long as it does not conflict with the law, public order and moral norms. These agreements cannot be withdrawn except with the consent of both parties, or for sufficient reasons according to law. The results of further research found that the franchisor could be said to be in default because he did not comply with the contents of the agreement in terminating an agreement due to violations committed by the franchisee. Because the agreement does not contain a clause that overrides the provisions of Article 1266 of the Civil Code, if there is a breach of contract or cancellation of the agreement, it is necessary to go through the process of requesting an annulment by the court and judge.

Actions (login required)

View Item