EFEKTIFITAS PASAL 44 KUHAP MENGENAI PENYIMPANAN BENDA SITAAN NEGARA DIKAITKAN DENGAN PROSES PERADILAN (STUDI KASUS RUMAH PENYIMPANAN BENDA SITAAN NEGARA KELAS II CILACAP)

Siki, Pedro Ariyanto (2024) EFEKTIFITAS PASAL 44 KUHAP MENGENAI PENYIMPANAN BENDA SITAAN NEGARA DIKAITKAN DENGAN PROSES PERADILAN (STUDI KASUS RUMAH PENYIMPANAN BENDA SITAAN NEGARA KELAS II CILACAP). S1 thesis, Universitas Atma Jaya Yogyakarta.

Preview	Text (Pedro Ariyanto Siki) 200513750 0.pdf Download (613kB) | Preview
Preview	Text 200513750 1.pdf Download (526kB) | Preview
	Text 200513750 2.pdf Restricted to Registered users only Download (439kB)
Preview	Text 200513750 3.pdf Download (960kB) | Preview

Abstract

The Storage House for Confiscated Objects and State-Confiscated Goods (RUPBASAN) has the main task of storing confiscated and confiscated state-owned objects. The background to the problem of conducting this research is because there are several RUPBASANs in Indonesia that do not have adequate infrastructure to carry out their functions. Apart from that, RUPBASAN's position seems to be overridden by other agencies in terms of storing confiscated objects. The aim of this research is to determine the effectiveness of Article 44 of the Criminal Procedure Code regarding the storage of confiscated objects in relation to the judicial process at the Class II RUPBASAN Cilacap. This type of research includes empirical research by comparing rules with facts that occur in the field. The analysis used is qualitative data analysis, meaning that the data that has been collected will be described and analyzed so as to obtain answers to the problems being studied. The results of this research show that there are several causes for RUPBASAN Class II Cilacap to implement Article 44 of the Criminal Procedure Code regarding the storage of confiscated objects. The causes include lack of adequate infrastructure, lack of human resources, the authority of other agencies similar to RUPBASAN. The conclusion of this research is that the position of RUPBASAN Cilacap in implementing Article 44 of the Criminal Procedure Code regarding the storage of confiscated objects is less effective due to several existing causal factors.

Actions (login required)

View Item