PERANAN KEJAKSAAN DAN KOMISI PEMBERANTASAN KORUPSI (KPK) DALAM MELAKUKAN PENYIDIKAN TINDAK PIDANA KORUPSI

HENOK, . (2010) PERANAN KEJAKSAAN DAN KOMISI PEMBERANTASAN KORUPSI (KPK) DALAM MELAKUKAN PENYIDIKAN TINDAK PIDANA KORUPSI. S1 thesis, UAJY.

Preview	Text (Halaman Judul) 0HK09084.pdf Download (1MB) | Preview
Preview	Text (Bab I) 1HK09084.pdf Download (67kB) | Preview
	Text (Bab II) 2HK09084.pdf Restricted to Registered users only Download (141kB)
Preview	Text (Bab III) 3HK09084.pdf Download (50kB) | Preview

Abstract

Corruption is a chronic case. This criminal action can disturb the stability and security of society, endanger social, economical and political development as well as destroy the democratic and moral values on the ground gradually this crime is culturizing. The corruption is a threat towards the social wise of fair and prosperous. From the aforementioned above background the author wrote legal writing/minithesis entitled “The Role of Attorney and Commission of Corruption Eliminator (KPK) in Conducting Investigation towards the Corruption Crime”. The author took the problem formulation, “How is the role of Attorney and Commission of Commission of Corruption Eliminator in conducting investigation of corruption crime?” The purpose of the research was to gain data on the role of Attorney and Commission of Corruption Eliminator in conducting investigation towards the corruption crime. It was normative legal research, i.e. a research focused on law in the book. The data sources consists of primary data, includes primary legal sources comprising of bonding legal sources containing valid regulations relating to the studied problem, and secondary legal sources comprising of primary legal sources, secondary legal source comprising of literatures, interview, and websites, and tertiary legal source comprising of dictionary. The method of data collection was conducted by literature study. The method of data analysis was conducted qualitatively. The method of drawing conclusion was conducted by deductive, i.e. drawing conclusion in general concept and ends in a specific conclusion of which is conducted by detailed, clear and precise description of legal problem. Based on the result of research it can be drawn conclusion relating to the authority to conduct investigation of corruption crime, that the attorney can conduct investigation through letter of command to initiate investigation (SPDP) from the Attorney, thus the Attorney has authority in conducting investigation of corruption crime at any price the nominal value as result emerged from the corruption crime.

Actions (login required)

View Item