DASAR PERTIMBANGAN MAJELIS HAKIM MENGABULKAN ATAU MENOLAK GUGATAN PIHAK KETIGA (INTERVENSI) DALAM PERKARA PERDATA DI PENGADILAN NEGERI SLEMAN

SOEWANDI, DODDY (2015) DASAR PERTIMBANGAN MAJELIS HAKIM MENGABULKAN ATAU MENOLAK GUGATAN PIHAK KETIGA (INTERVENSI) DALAM PERKARA PERDATA DI PENGADILAN NEGERI SLEMAN. S1 thesis, UAJY.

	Text (Halaman Judul) HK009445.pdf Download (168kB)
	Text (Bab I) HK109445.pdf Download (68kB)
	Text (Bab II) HK209445.pdf Restricted to Registered users only Download (145kB)
	Text (Bab III) HK309445.pdf Download (40kB)

Abstract

Legal study authors wrote about the basic consideration of the panel of judges to grant or reject the third party claim in a civil case in court Sleman to know the basic consideration in a civil case the judge examine granting and refusing intervention tussenkomst. the judge is the legal profession, which is essentially a judicial organ, which was given the mandate by God to examine, decide, judge legal issues in the functioning of justice. Tussenkomst intervention is a third party claim were deemed to have an interest to join in the process of civil disputes impartially, but to fight for its own interests so that judges require consideration in the examined. This legal research using normative methods with interviews with the judges sources. From the research that has done, the writer found hat consideration of the judge to grant or deny entry into the Third Party Tussenkomst a case, based on the presence or absence of a legal interest Interventient as interested parties. formal and substantive qualify as a lawsuit, but the process is different from the ordinary civil action. one difference is the inclusion of a lawsuit is determined by the judge.

Actions (login required)

View Item