DESIGN OF SPECIAL CONCENTRICALLY BRACED FRAME USING TWO-STORY X BRACING

PRASETYA, ADITYA SURYA (2010) DESIGN OF SPECIAL CONCENTRICALLY BRACED FRAME USING TWO-STORY X BRACING. S1 thesis, UAJY.

Preview	Text (Cover Title) 0TSI12394.pdf Download (938kB) | Preview
Preview	Text (Chapter I) 1TSI12394.pdf Download (54kB) | Preview
Preview	Text (Chapter II) 2TSI12394.pdf Download (809kB) | Preview
	Text (Chapter III) 3TSI12394.pdf Restricted to Registered users only Download (736kB)
	Text (Chapter IV) 4TSI12394.pdf Restricted to Registered users only Download (484kB)
Preview	Text (Chapter V) 5TSI12394.pdf Download (107kB) | Preview

Abstract

The advantage of Special Concentrically Braced Frame (SCBF) in the seismic steel design is high R factor. Currently, the usage of Chevron bracing is much avoided because it requires the beam to be designed due to unbalanced forces which exist because of the redistribution forces in the bracing that withstand the compression force is buckle. The alternative beside Chevron bracing is two-story X-bracing that can withstand the unbalance forces on the beam so that the beam cross section becomes smaller. But research results in three SCBF (3, 9 and 18 stories) by Richards (2009) using static pushover analysis and non-linear dynamic analysis with 10 earthquake records show that the normalized column demands which is the ratio between the maximum axial force (Pu) to axial force elastic lateral load equivalent (Pe) reached Pu / Pe = 4.2 for the first and second story columns on 3 stories of SCBF, 2.2 ≤ Pu / Pe ≤ 4.8 for all columns on 9 stories of SCBF and 1.8 ≤ Pu / Pe ≤ 5.0 for the fifth story column upward on 18 stories of SCBF. The results of this study show the seismic column demands (Pu) in CBF with low and moderate levels could exceed ΩoPe = 2 Pe for

Actions (login required)

View Item