Purba, Pangeran Abdi (2018) KETERKAITAN PUTUSAN MK NOMOR 34/PUU-XI/2013 TENTANG PENINJAUAN KEMBALI DENGAN ASAS PERADILAN YANG SEDERHANA, CEPAT DAN BIAYA RINGAN. S1 thesis, UAJY.
|
Text (HALAMAN JUDUL)
HK111500.pdf Download (5MB) | Preview |
|
|
Text (BAB I)
HK111501.pdf Download (347kB) | Preview |
|
|
Text (BAB II)
HK111502.pdf Download (393kB) | Preview |
|
![[img]](http://e-journal.uajy.ac.id/style/images/fileicons/text.png) |
Text (BAB III)
HK111503.pdf Restricted to Registered users only Download (356kB) |
Abstract
The Supreme Court has the authority to decide on a review request. a review is an extraordinary remedy that can be done by a convict to the supreme court. by the bebab it was made the Constitutional Court decision number 34 / PUU-IX / 2013 on the review. the review process takes a considerable amount of time and is costly, thus contradicting the simple, quick and light cost of justice. This study uses normative research method with the aim to find out whether the decision of Constitutional Court number 34 / PUU-IX / 2013 on the review contradicts the principle of simple, fast and lightweight. the conclusion of the results of this study is the verdict of the constitutional court number 34 / PUU-IX / 2013 on the review contrary to the principle of simple justice, fast and low cost.
| Item Type: | Thesis (S1) |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | simple justice principles, fast, light cost, legal effort |
| Subjects: | Ilmu Hukum > Peradilan dan Penyelesaian Sengketa Hukum |
| Divisions: | Fakultas Hukum > Program Studi Ilmu Hukum |
| Depositing User: | Editor UAJY |
| Date Deposited: | 11 Feb 2019 07:55 |
| Last Modified: | 11 Feb 2019 07:55 |
| URI: | http://e-journal.uajy.ac.id/id/eprint/16511 |
Actions (login required)
 |
View Item |
