KESUMA, METTHA AUDINA (2019) PERTANGGUNGJAWABAN PIDANA ADVOKAT TERKAIT DENGAN CONTEMPT OF COURT DALAM PERADILAN INDONESIA. S1 thesis, UAJY.
|
Text (HALAMAN AWAL)
HK112260.pdf Download (1MB) | Preview |
|
|
Text (BAB I)
HK112261.pdf Download (249kB) | Preview |
|
|
Text (BAB II)
HK112262.pdf Download (369kB) | Preview |
|
Text (BAB III)
HK112263.pdf Restricted to Registered users only Download (298kB) |
Abstract
The limitation of an Advocate do contempt of court according to the applicable provisions is in the first case the limit is in accordance with the article imposed on him namely Article 217 of the Criminal Code with the threat of imprisonment for a maximum of three weeks or a fine of at most one thousand eight hundred rupiahs, then criminal liability. the contempt of court in the second case is in accordance with the article indicated to him, namely article 310 of the Criminal Code with the threat of imprisonment for a maximum of nine months or a fine of at most four thousand five hundred rupiah. Criminal liability Advocates who carry out contempt of court in Indonesian courts, namely based on direct contempt / criminal contempt and indirect contempt / civil contempt. Direct contempt is qualified based on its sustainability, when the actor (Advocate) is inside and outside the trial or in and around the court. While indirect contempt is qualified for its contempt of court continuity
Item Type: | Thesis (S1) |
---|---|
Uncontrolled Keywords: | contempt of court, justice, responsibility, lawyer |
Subjects: | Ilmu Hukum > Peradilan dan Penyelesaian Sengketa Hukum |
Divisions: | Fakultas Hukum > Program Studi Ilmu Hukum |
Depositing User: | Editor UAJY |
Date Deposited: | 08 Apr 2019 05:58 |
Last Modified: | 08 Apr 2019 05:58 |
URI: | http://e-journal.uajy.ac.id/id/eprint/18141 |
Actions (login required)
View Item |