SISTEM PERWAKILAN DALAM MAJELIS PERMUSYAWARATAN RAKYAT PASCA AMANDEMEN UUD 1945

Seno, Aryo (2010) SISTEM PERWAKILAN DALAM MAJELIS PERMUSYAWARATAN RAKYAT PASCA AMANDEMEN UUD 1945. S1 thesis, UAJY.

Preview	Text (Halaman Judul) 0HK08033.pdf Download (641kB) | Preview
Preview	Text (Bab I) 1HK08033.pdf Download (109kB) | Preview
	Text (Bab II) 2HK08033.pdf Restricted to Registered users only Download (207kB)
Preview	Text (Bab III) 3HK08033.pdf Download (80kB) | Preview

Abstract

1945 Constitution (UUD 1945) as the basic rules or constitution of the Republic of Indonesia has undergone changes or amendment four times. Each change is a manifestation of the implementation of democracy to prevent the possibility of abuses of authority and power that are authoritarian and also to restore freedom and human rights and other democratic rights. In the explanation of 1945 Constitution before the change, the number three roman said that "the highest state power in the hands of the People's Consultative Assembly," stated that the People's Consultative Assembly (MPR) as a form of embodiment of all Indonesian people, which can also be interpreted as an Indonesian parliament. MPR is an institution that holds the state and implement the people's sovereignty, or could be called the highest state institution. Amandement to the Constitution that has changed the administrative structure of the Republic of Indonesia, also change the system or a parliamentary representative institutions in Indonesia. People's Consultative Assembly (MPR) based on the third amendment of the 1945 Constitution, became equal with other state agencies, and only run the people's sovereignty which is only determined in 1945 Constitution after the change. Thus there is no expression of the highest state institution that has unlimited power, as defined in the explanation of the original 1945 Constitution. Based on the things that have been described, the authors intend to analize what kind of representative system currently applied in the People's Consultative Assembly after the change of the 1945 Constitution? The author reviewed the data obtained in this study through library research, which analyzed by understanding and string up existing data, and then presented completely to obtain an overview of the investigated problem's object. The author finds that in Indonesia is currently implementing the system or the bicameral representative of two rooms that are soft or weak because of differences about the authority possessed by each representative body that exists in Indonesia by differentiating power and authority between the people's representative institutions, where power and authority of the Parliament is stronger than the regional representative council (DPD).

Actions (login required)

View Item