PENGAWASAN DAN PELAKSANAAN PUTUSAN PIDANA PEMBAYARAN UANG PENGGANTI DALAM TINDAK PIDANA KORUPSI

KUSUMO, ADITYO WISNU (2012) PENGAWASAN DAN PELAKSANAAN PUTUSAN PIDANA PEMBAYARAN UANG PENGGANTI DALAM TINDAK PIDANA KORUPSI. S1 thesis, UAJY.

Preview	Text (Bab I) 1HK09177.pdf Download (91kB) | Preview
	Text (Bab II) 2HK09177.pdf Restricted to Registered users only Download (194kB)
Preview	Text (Bab III) 3HK09177.pdf Download (69kB) | Preview
Preview	Text (Halaman Judul) 9HK09177.pdf Download (343kB) | Preview

Abstract

Corruptionis a crime that has the effector the result of very bad for the development ofa nation, the fact of corruption has causeda huge loss to the state that have an impacton the crisis in many areas. To that end, efforts to preventand fight against corruption needs tobe improved and intensified to up hold human rights and the public interest. Corruptionis a form of crime committed in a systematic and well organized, and carried out by people who have an important position and rolein the social order. In corrupt practices in such a way to cleanly mode crime and quality, making it difficult to reveal corruption. Recognizing the complexity of the problem of corruption, in the writing of this paper the author discusses about the problem: 1)How does the monitoring and implementation of the payment of indemnity by the Prosecutor, and 2)What are the obstacles in the monitoring and enforcement of payment of compensation criminal corruption. It is motivated by the formor the technical supervision of the implementation of the compensation process as if that could be implemented by law enforcemen tagenciesin this case the Attorney General of the Republic of Indonesia, and at this stage ofthe process where the prose cutor can conduct forced effortconfiscatory action on prisonerssuspected of assetsis the result obtained against laws that would negate the payment of compensationas well as goods -what are the items that can be seized by the prosecutionin the case of convicted corruption missed agracelimit payment of compensation specified in thelegislations. Based on there search, writing answers to existing problems, namely: still being debatedon the realization ofthe compensation has always been a lengthy, well since the enactment ofLaw-Corruption Act No. 3of 1971anduntiltheAct-ActNo.31of 1999joLaw-LawNo.20 of 2001, particularly in relation tothe implementationof thepayment of compensation. Realityin practiceuntil now has not beenable to be effectively implemented, because manyfactorsthat hinderbothconvicts, law enforcement, the difference in interpretation ofthe state,as well a srules relatedegislation. And then the enforcement of a payment of compensationin the High CourtDIYrun smoothly without anysignificant obstacles, meaning that nosignificant obstaclesfoundin the technicalsupervision andenforcement of payment of compensationin the High CourtD.I.Yogyakarta.

Actions (login required)

View Item