KAJIAN YURIDIS TENTANG PUTUSAN KOMISI PENGAWAS PERSAINGAN USAHA NOMOR 10/KPPU-L/2009 TERKAIT PEMBATALAN PERJANJIAN PENETAPAN HARGA (STUDI KASUS ASATIN)

HARTOYO, ARDY (2013) KAJIAN YURIDIS TENTANG PUTUSAN KOMISI PENGAWAS PERSAINGAN USAHA NOMOR 10/KPPU-L/2009 TERKAIT PEMBATALAN PERJANJIAN PENETAPAN HARGA (STUDI KASUS ASATIN). S1 thesis, UAJY.

[img]
Preview
Text (Halaman Judul)
0HK10303.pdf

Download (362kB) | Preview
[img]
Preview
Text (Bab I)
1HK10303.pdf

Download (213kB) | Preview
[img] Text (Bab II)
2HK10303.pdf
Restricted to Registered users only

Download (420kB)
[img]
Preview
Text (Bab III)
3HK10303.pdf

Download (327kB) | Preview

Abstract

Price fixing agreement is one of the probihited agreement in statue No 5/1999 about antitrust law and unfair competition. ASATIN, is one of ticketing organization in Lombok, Mataram, in which the members were verdicted by the assembly of the business competition supervisory commission, because they made an agreement about the amount of fee given the sub agent who sold the airlines tickets from the Agents, namely the ASATIN Members. In the verdict, the agreement is against clause 5 paragraph (1) of statue No. 5/1999 about antitrust law and unfair competition. From the above background, it is in the writing of this essay presented three main issues, namely : what is the legal consideration given by the assembly of the business competition supervisory commission in verdict No. 10/KPPU-L/2009, which has annul the price fixing agreement that created by the members of ASATIN ? Can the amount of fee agreement be qualified as price fixing agreement which regulated in clause 5 paragraph (1) of statue No. 5/1999 about antitrust law and unfair competition ? and what are the legal consequences of the annulated price fixing agreement that created by the members of ASATIN?. This research is normative research, made by reviewing/analyzing secondary data in the form of legal materials, especially primary legal materials and secondary legal materials to understand the law as a set of rules or norms in the system of positive law governing the human life. The conclusion of the research indicate that the amount of fee agreement cannpt be qualified as a price fixing agreement because there is a different interpretation within some factors such as price and the legal subject between the agent and the sub agent which is the agency partnership.

Item Type: Thesis (S1)
Uncontrolled Keywords: Price fixing agreement, statue No. 5/1999 antitrust law and unfair competition, amount of fee agreement
Subjects: Ilmu Hukum > Ekonomi Bisnis
Divisions: Fakultas Hukum > Program Studi Ilmu Hukum
Depositing User: Editor UAJY
Date Deposited: 08 Apr 2014 08:20
Last Modified: 08 Apr 2014 08:20
URI: http://e-journal.uajy.ac.id/id/eprint/5073

Actions (login required)

View Item View Item