EKSEKUSI PUTUSAN PENGADILAN TENTANG PEMBAYARAN UANG PENGGANTI DALAM TINDAK PIDANA KORUPSI

LEJAU, RAYMUNDUS (2009) EKSEKUSI PUTUSAN PENGADILAN TENTANG PEMBAYARAN UANG PENGGANTI DALAM TINDAK PIDANA KORUPSI. S1 thesis, UAJY.

Preview	Text (Halaman Judul) 0HK07873.pdf Download (141kB) | Preview
Preview	Text (Bab I) 1HK07873.pdf Download (64kB) | Preview
	Text (Bab II) 2HK07873.pdf Restricted to Registered users only Download (152kB)
Preview	Text (Bab III) 3HK07873.pdf Download (949kB) | Preview

Abstract

Corruption in Indonesia is a very extraordinary crimes, because problems of corruption which knock over Indonesia very serious and have isn't it joints life of nation and state. Corruption not only harming state's finance but have also is violation to social and economic rights of widely society. Therefore eradication of corruption not only addressed to punish the perpetrator but also return of loss of state through additional crime in the form of substitution money. Execute conducted by attorney after justice decision with power of law remain to and process the solving of case of corruption need very long time, hence possibility hide or eliminate evidence appliance and properties of corruption result by very big defendant. Amount payment of substitution money at most is equal to obtained good and chattels of corruption result. If punished not pay for payment of substitution money at longest one months after decision have obtained legal force remain to, hence the good and chattel of can be confiscated and auction by attorney to close over substitution money. If punished don't have good and chattel to pay substitution money, hence changed with prison crime old ones him not exceed maximum threat of in essence crime. Intention of this research is to look for soybean cakes how execute process conducted by attorney to payment of substitution money. Used research method that is research of supported normative with research of field to get data by interview. Research result in the reality that executing justice decision concerning payment of substitution money many constraints because corruption is usually conducted by people owning high intellectual and domicile important in society so that process detection to properties of hard corruptor to be found. A attorney righteously have to draw up everything him compactly related accurate information about corruptor good and chattel, conducive and relevant parties and family of existence of good and chattel will. Thereby, assertion not becomes a fool for one's pains and state money can be saved. For the attorney shall more active in reports concerning existence of corruption anticipation which enter from society without reference to big or the so small case or with regulation of law applying.

Actions (login required)

View Item